🔗 Share this article

As any major awards ceremony nears, there’s always a clamor for introducing additional classifications to honor unsung work and fill the passions of fans who have specialized interests.

My colleague previously argued supporting a scary games classification. It would be amazing. Equally deserving are tabletop games, this being a dedicated supporter's campaign. But they will have to forgive me if I try to elbow in front since similar to single-minded supporters, there's a strong justification for why my demand remains most pressing above others. Here's the proposal: There should be an award type for logic-based games.

Categorizing Game Types

Classifying creative works is not a science; opinions vary greatly, and it will always spark debates and end in fuzzy definitions. This explains why cinema institutions steer clear of genre categories. But it is an essential concession within the realm of gaming, showing incredible range it's challenging to consider them as a single art form.

For the full spectrum of achievement in video games to gain proper attention, while allowing diverse titles to have a chance for representation, genre categories are essential.

Existing Game Classification System

Leading game ceremonies presently include award types recognizing Action, Action/Adventure, RPG experiences, Fighting, Sim/Strategy, and Sports/Racing games. Between them, these six categories actually cover numerous genres, and you can find room for numerous titles.

This doesn't apply to brain-teasing titles. No suitable classification appears to put them. Think about these recent excellent titles, each quite distinct: structural challenges in a particular game, fast-paced pattern recognition of another game, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles in another game. Which classification works within current classifications? Nowhere, that’s where.

Acknowledgment Issues

Numerous examples exist of brilliant puzzle games released every year that have no home in entertainment awards, if they accidentally match award groups including Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, and the highly challenging independent game categories.

• A renowned logic title wasn’t nominated in any category that year
• Another imaginative release missed out that year
• Well-received sorting experience got ignored that year
• Just some logic titles managed to sneak into small studio or handheld classifications

Value of Brain-Teasers

Frequently they represent small games, yet the craft in brain-teasers carries substantial weight. Well-known matching games rank among most engaged experiences globally continuing this trend for over a decade.

The iconic tile-matching title challenges famous sandbox experiences competing to become highest-selling title ever; it’s also in the running as greatest title ever. Puzzle games are foundational to the art of video games, while interacting with almost every other genre.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Logic titles wouldn't face such difficulty. It would be easy to populate multiple candidates engaging, different, qualified experiences every year with ease — actually, with challenge, because you’d have to leave so many good games out.

Restating the point, these represent titles lacking appropriate categories in important events. Puzzle game makers function at the challenging frontier interactive creation, developing some of the purest expressions within interactive entertainment. Just like film action specialists, they merit acknowledgment. Don't make them wait 35 years.